|
|
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| [[File:Dos.jpg|103px|Dos.jpg|alt=Dos.jpg]] | | [[File:Dos.jpg|103px|Dos.jpg|alt=Dos.jpg]] |
| | | |
− | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" style="width: 100%" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" | + | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" style="width: 100%" |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 25%" | '''Start writing!''' | | | style="width: 25%" | '''Start writing!''' |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | '''Design your article!''' | | | '''Design your article!''' |
| | | | | |
− | Make your article visually more attractive for the reader by including informative '''[[Draw Tables|tables]]''', '''[[Insert_File_as_Picture_/_Link|pictures and graphes]]'''.<br/> | + | Make your article visually more attractive for the reader by including informative '''[[Draw Tables|tables]]''', '''[[Insert_File_as_Picture_/_Link|pictures and graphs]]'''.<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Link your articles!''' | | | '''Link your articles!''' |
| | | | | |
− | Instead of writing the same information again in your text (for example, definitions or procedures), simply '''[[Link Articles|link to existing articles]]''' which already explain the relevant point in detail. This will not only increase the information value of your article but also the likelihood of people finding it on energypedia.<br/> | + | Instead of writing the same information again in your text (for example, definitions or procedures), simply '''[[Link Articles|link to existing articles]]''' which already explain the relevant point in detail. This will not only increase the information value of your article but also the likelihood of people finding it on <span data-scaytid="2" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span>.<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Categorize your article!''' | | | '''Categorize your article!''' |
| | | | | |
− | All articles should be '''[[How to use Categories|categorized]]''' with one or more category. This will help users to find your article and more generally will give energypedia an underlining structure.<br/> | + | All articles should be '''[[How to use Categories|categorized]]''' with one or more category. This will help users to find your article and more generally will give <span data-scaytid="4" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span> an underlining structure.<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Keep editing articles!''' | | | '''Keep editing articles!''' |
| | | | | |
− | To continiously improve energypedia, its users have to fill content gaps, correct typing errors or change outdated information if they come across them. That is why '''[[Edit|editing articles]]''' is so important for the quality of a wiki.<br/> | + | To continuously improve <span data-scaytid="6" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span>, its users have to fill content gaps, correct typing errors or change outdated information if they come across them. That is why '''[[Edit|editing articles]]''' is so important for the quality of a wiki.<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Be rational!''' | | | '''Be rational!''' |
| | | | | |
− | While working collaborativley with others on an article you might disagree about some passages. Avoid constant reverting of other people's edits which will lead into edit wars. Rather '''[[Discussions|start a discussion]]''' explaining your thinking and reasons for edits and allow others to response. Thereby, keep in mind that you argue facts not personalities.<br/> | + | While working <span data-scaytid="8" data-scayt_word="collaborativley">collaborativley</span> with others on an article you might disagree about some passages. Avoid constant reverting of other people's edits which will lead into edit wars. Rather '''[[Discussions|start a discussion]]''' explaining your thinking and reasons for edits and allow others to response. Thereby, keep in mind that you argue facts not personalities.<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
Line 61: |
Line 61: |
| [[File:Donts.jpg|138px|Donts.jpg|alt=Donts.jpg]] | | [[File:Donts.jpg|138px|Donts.jpg|alt=Donts.jpg]] |
| | | |
− | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" style="width: 100%" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" | + | {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" style="width: 100%" |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 25%" | '''Simple uploading of files!''' | | | style="width: 25%" | '''Simple uploading of files!''' |
| | | | | |
− | Rather summarize relevant content in a wiki article or link directly to a file on another homepage as energypedia is not a file sharing plattform.<br/> | + | Rather summarize relevant content in a wiki article or link directly to a file on another homepage as <span data-scaytid="10" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span> is not a file sharing platform.<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Copy and paste!''' | | | '''Copy and paste!''' |
| | | | | |
− | The advantage of energypedia is that it collects, summarizes and combines knowledge. Hence, copy and paste of whole publications does not offer any additional value for energypedia readers (besides that it is probably an copyright violation). Rather ask yourself which parts of a publication are relevant and in which existing articles you might be able to integrate them (Don't forget to citate and reference correctly!).<br/> | + | The advantage of <span data-scaytid="12" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span> is that it collects, summarizes and combines knowledge. Hence, copy and paste of whole publications does not offer any additional value for <span data-scaytid="13" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span> readers (besides that it is probably an copyright violation). Rather ask yourself which parts of a publication are relevant and in which existing articles you might be able to integrate them (Don't forget to cite and reference correctly!).<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Links to closed systems!''' | | | '''Links to closed systems!''' |
| | | | | |
− | If you link to a file, make sure that it is an open (password unprotected) website since otherwise energypedia users will not be able to access these documents<br/> | + | If you link to a file, make sure that it is an open (password unprotected) website since otherwise <span data-scaytid="16" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span> users will not be able to access these documents<br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
Line 85: |
Line 85: |
| | '''Complaints about poor content!''' | | | '''Complaints about poor content!''' |
| | | | | |
− | If you think that an article is incomplete or even incorrect then do not simply complain about it but help to improve energypedia's content: start a discussion about questionable statements, rate articles, mark them with a maintenance template, edit existing articles or even create a new one on topics which have not yet been dealt with. | + | If you think that an article is incomplete or even incorrect then do not simply complain about it but help to improve <span data-scaytid="18" data-scayt_word="energypedia's">energypedia's</span> content: start a discussion about questionable statements, rate articles, mark them with a maintenance template, edit existing articles or even create a new one on topics which have not yet been dealt with. |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Slang or colloquial language!''' | | | '''Slang or colloquial language!''' |
| | | | | |
− | Energypedia's claim is to offer quality information on renewable energies, do not let people think you have nothing important to tell by using sloppy expressions in your article. | + | <span data-scaytid="19" data-scayt_word="Energypedia's">Energypedia's</span> claim is to offer quality information on renewable energies, do not let people think you have nothing important to tell by using sloppy expressions in your article. |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Unspecific titles!''' | | | '''Unspecific titles!''' |
| | | | | |
− | An overly unspecific title makes it very difficult for readers to identify if an article is interesting for them or not. Moreover, due to technical reasons, no articles can have an identitical title which makes specific enough article titles a necessity. | + | An overly unspecific title makes it very difficult for readers to identify if an article is interesting for them or not. Moreover, due to technical reasons, no articles can have an identical title which makes specific enough article titles a necessity. |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Arbitrary content!''' | | | '''Arbitrary content!''' |
| | | | | |
− | Energypedia aims at compiling information on renewable energy energy efficiency, new technologies and all related issue (for example, social and environmental impacts). So think first if your content fits on this platform. | + | <span data-scaytid="21" data-scayt_word="Energypedia">Energypedia</span> aims at compiling information on renewable energy energy efficiency, new technologies and all related issue (for example, social and environmental impacts). So think first if your content fits on this platform. |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Personal insults!''' | | | '''Personal insults!''' |
| | | | | |
− | Energypedia will not tolerate personal insults against other users or social groups in any form! Violations of this rule might lead to exclusion from energypedia! | + | <span data-scaytid="22" data-scayt_word="Energypedia">Energypedia</span> will not tolerate personal insults against other users or social groups in any form! Violations of this rule might lead to exclusion from <span data-scaytid="23" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span>! |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | '''Edit wars!''' | | | '''Edit wars!''' |
| | | | | |
− | The ability to change articles on energypedia is a core advantage over ordinary webpages, however it can cause so-called edit wars when editors disagree about content and repeatedly rewrite each other's contributions. Such a series of back-and-forth reverts is very unconstructive for the whole community and destroys the working atmosphere amongst its users. If you realize that there is disagreement about content, do not just re-edit but rather start a discussion to solve the dispute in a civilized manner. | + | The ability to change articles on <span data-scaytid="26" data-scayt_word="energypedia">energypedia</span> is a core advantage over ordinary webpages, however it can cause so-called edit wars when editors disagree about content and repeatedly rewrite each other's contributions. Such a series of back-and-forth reverts is very <span data-scaytid="28" data-scayt_word="unconstructive">unconstructive</span> for the whole community and destroys the working atmosphere amongst its users. If you realize that there is disagreement about content, do not just re-edit but rather start a discussion to solve the dispute in a civilized manner. |
| | | |
| |} | | |} |
Simple uploading of files!
|
Rather summarize relevant content in a wiki article or link directly to a file on another homepage as energypedia is not a file sharing platform.
|
Copy and paste!
|
The advantage of energypedia is that it collects, summarizes and combines knowledge. Hence, copy and paste of whole publications does not offer any additional value for energypedia readers (besides that it is probably an copyright violation). Rather ask yourself which parts of a publication are relevant and in which existing articles you might be able to integrate them (Don't forget to cite and reference correctly!).
|
Links to closed systems!
|
If you link to a file, make sure that it is an open (password unprotected) website since otherwise energypedia users will not be able to access these documents
|
"Further Information" sections!
|
All important information should be included in wiki articles but don't forget to link to interesting documents or articles for "Further Information".
|
Complaints about poor content!
|
If you think that an article is incomplete or even incorrect then do not simply complain about it but help to improve energypedia's content: start a discussion about questionable statements, rate articles, mark them with a maintenance template, edit existing articles or even create a new one on topics which have not yet been dealt with.
|
Slang or colloquial language!
|
Energypedia's claim is to offer quality information on renewable energies, do not let people think you have nothing important to tell by using sloppy expressions in your article.
|
Unspecific titles!
|
An overly unspecific title makes it very difficult for readers to identify if an article is interesting for them or not. Moreover, due to technical reasons, no articles can have an identical title which makes specific enough article titles a necessity.
|
Arbitrary content!
|
Energypedia aims at compiling information on renewable energy energy efficiency, new technologies and all related issue (for example, social and environmental impacts). So think first if your content fits on this platform.
|
Personal insults!
|
Energypedia will not tolerate personal insults against other users or social groups in any form! Violations of this rule might lead to exclusion from energypedia!
|
Edit wars!
|
The ability to change articles on energypedia is a core advantage over ordinary webpages, however it can cause so-called edit wars when editors disagree about content and repeatedly rewrite each other's contributions. Such a series of back-and-forth reverts is very unconstructive for the whole community and destroys the working atmosphere amongst its users. If you realize that there is disagreement about content, do not just re-edit but rather start a discussion to solve the dispute in a civilized manner.
|